The most important advantage of executive agreements in policy-making for the president is that they allow for greater flexibility and expediency in the execution of foreign policy initiatives.
Executive agreements are agreements between the president and foreign governments or international organizations that do not require Senate approval. Unlike treaties, which require two-thirds of the Senate to ratify them, executive agreements can be made solely by the president.
This gives the president greater freedom to negotiate and implement foreign policy initiatives without being bogged down by the lengthy and often complicated process of getting a treaty ratified. It also allows for more efficient decision-making in response to rapidly evolving global events.
Executive agreements have been used by presidents for a variety of purposes, including arms control, trade, and environmental agreements. For example, President Obama used executive agreements to negotiate the Paris Climate Agreement and the Iran nuclear deal. President Trump also utilized executive agreements, particularly in the realm of trade, to make changes to NAFTA and other international trade agreements.
The flexibility of executive agreements also allows the president to circumvent potential roadblocks in the Senate, such as political divisions or opposition from senators. This is particularly important in situations where time is of the essence and swift action is required.
Furthermore, executive agreements are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as treaties, which can be heavily debated and amended by the Senate. This means that the president can negotiate and implement agreements with greater efficiency and privacy.
In conclusion, the most important advantage of executive agreements in policy-making for the president is that they provide greater flexibility and expediency in the execution of foreign policy initiatives. This allows the president to respond more quickly and efficiently to global events, and also provides a means of circumventing potential roadblocks in the Senate. While there may be some concerns about the lack of oversight and scrutiny for these agreements, their benefits in terms of efficiency and expediency cannot be denied.